Coating Removal Parameters-Shanghai Lionstek Co.,Ltd.


网站正在维护中,请稍后访问!

客服电话:18701797360


技术支持: 竹子建站

Shanghai Lionstek Co.,Ltd.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Toll-free number:400-077-8606

Coating Removal Parameters

Release time:2020-03-10 15:47

Wright et al.* presented a paper on parameters that affects surface preparation on the 2007 WJTA conference. Here are the highlights.

A series of coating removal tests were conducted on commercial grade coated steel siding trim sections at 240 MPa (35,000 psi) and flow rates of 11 to 22 lpm (3 to 6 gpm). Removal effectiveness was judged by visual estimation of the percentage removal of the top coating and the primer. Two different types of heads were used in these tests: bar head and bent arms (see pictures). Several parameters were varied during the tests and the results are summarized here.


  • Standoff Distance: When the standoff distance is less than 18 to 42 times the orifice diameter for the bar heads and up to 67 times the orifice diameter for the bent arms, the jet is too close to be effective. The most effective removal with the bar head occurred with standoff distance to be 65 to 95 times the orifice diameter.
  • Rotation Speed:  As a function of the jet path diameter and rpm, the linear velocity that the jet is moving has a direct impact to the removal effectiveness. The level of its impact also depends on four other parameters --- standoff distance, orifice diameter, feed rate, and head design. As a general trend, the linear velocity of the nozzle should be no more than 20 m/sec (66 ft/sec).
  •  Feed Rate and Jet Path Diameter: Feed rate is the most significant parameter affecting removal effectiveness. Obviously increasing feed rate caused decrease of removal effectiveness. Theoretically the feed rate can be calculated with this formula: Feed Rate = Orifice Diameter • Number of Jets • rpm. But because the jet path diameter is not accounted for in this formula, a multiplication factor should be considered, with 1.5 for the largest bar head and 3 for the smallest.
  • Jet Angle: A 5 degree outward jet angle improved the coating removal by 15 – 20%.
  • Head Design: Compared to the bar head, the bent arm head improved the efficiency of coating removal by 25 to 30 percent.

* Wright, D., Wolgamott, J., Zink, G. (2007) PARAMETERS AFFECTING SURFACE PREPARATION, in Mahamed Hashish (ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 American WJTA Conference and Expo, August 19-21, Houston, Texas, Paper 2-A.

Scan the qrcode to reading this article on your phone

Copyright© Shanghai Lionstek Co.,Ltd.    沪ICP备12034959号-1    Technical Support: 竹子建站
该网站使用竹子建站创建 立即创建